THORChain Review 2026: Is Native Cross-Chain Worth the Risk?

Review
3 februari 2026
Throchain Review Dexrank

This is our independent THORChain Review (2026). Can you really swap native BTC for native ETH without bridges? Is THORChain safe after the $200M collapse? And should you trust a protocol that's been used for money laundering?

Summary of this THORChain review: THORChain offers something unique: true cross-chain swaps without wrapped tokens. You can swap real Bitcoin for real Ethereum — not wBTC, not a bridge IOU, but actual native assets. No other decentralized protocol does this at scale. The December 2025 native interface launch made this more accessible than ever.

But we must be direct about the risks. In January 2025, THORChain's THORFi lending and savers programs collapsed, resulting in over $200 million in user losses. Withdrawals were halted. Legal action is pending against the protocol and its principals. This wasn't a hack — it was insolvency from mismanaged lending products.

Additionally, THORChain has been identified as a money laundering vector. DPRK hackers used it to launder funds from the Bybit hack in February 2025. This creates regulatory and reputational concerns that may affect the protocol's future.

Our recommendation: THORChain's native swap technology is genuinely innovative and useful for specific needs. Use it for small-to-medium native swaps when you can't use alternatives. Do NOT use the lending or yield products. Keep exposure minimal. Understand the risks.

For most cross-chain needs, consider bridges like LayerZero or centralized exchanges despite their tradeoffs. THORChain is a tool for specific situations, not a primary DEX.

THORChain Review - Introduction

THORChain launched in 2018 with an ambitious goal: decentralized cross-chain liquidity without wrapped tokens. Unlike bridges that create synthetic representations of assets, THORChain uses liquidity pools on each chain to facilitate true native swaps.

Key Facts (Updated February 2026):

  • Launched: 2018 (mainnet 2021)
  • Type: Cross-chain DEX with native swaps
  • Supported Chains: Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Avalanche, Cosmos, Dogecoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, TRON
  • Token: RUNE — liquidity bonding and security
  • Status: Core swaps operational; THORFi lending/savers halted

Recent Timeline:

  • January 2025: THORFi collapse, $200M+ user losses, withdrawals halted
  • February 2025: Used for Bybit hack money laundering
  • May 2025: Legal action announced against protocol
  • December 2025: New native swap interface launched (public beta)
  • Q1 2026: Official interface launch planned

Who is THORChain for? Users who specifically need native cross-chain swaps (real BTC to real ETH) and cannot or will not use centralized exchanges. Crypto-native users comfortable with protocol risk.

Who is THORChain NOT for? Risk-averse users. Anyone seeking yield products. Users with large amounts to swap. Those concerned about regulatory compliance.

THORChain Review - How It Works

THORChain enables native swaps through a network of liquidity pools and validator nodes.

Native Swap Mechanism

Unlike bridges that lock assets and mint wrapped versions:

1. You send native BTC to a THORChain vault address 2. THORChain validators observe the deposit 3. Swap executes through RUNE-paired liquidity pools 4. You receive native ETH from an Ethereum vault

At no point do you hold wrapped tokens. Your BTC becomes real ETH.

Supported swap pairs:

  • Bitcoin (BTC)
  • Ethereum (ETH) and ERC-20s
  • BNB Chain tokens
  • Avalanche (AVAX)
  • Cosmos (ATOM)
  • Dogecoin (DOGE)
  • Litecoin (LTC)
  • Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
  • TRON (TRX)

Liquidity Pools

THORChain uses a unique pool structure:

  • Every pool pairs with RUNE (e.g., BTC/RUNE, ETH/RUNE)
  • Cross-chain swaps route through RUNE (BTC → RUNE → ETH)
  • Liquidity providers earn swap fees

Streaming Swaps

For large orders, THORChain offers streaming swaps:

  • Order broken into smaller sub-swaps over time
  • Reduces price impact
  • Improves execution on large amounts

THORFi (⚠️ Currently Halted)

THORFi included:

  • Savers: Single-sided yield deposits
  • Lending: Borrow against deposited assets

These products collapsed in January 2025 and should not be used.

THORChain Review - Fees

Fee ComponentAmountNotes
Network Fee0.02 RUNEPer THORChain transaction
Outbound FeeChain-specificBTC, ETH gas, etc.
Slip FeeVariableBased on pool depth
Affiliate Fee0-1%If using affiliate interface

Total Swap Cost: Typical swap costs 0.1-0.5% all-in, depending on:

  • Size of swap (larger = more slip)
  • Pool liquidity depth
  • Source/destination chain gas prices

Example: $10,000 BTC → ETH swap:

  • THORChain fees: ~$20-50
  • Bitcoin network fee: ~$5-20
  • Ethereum gas: ~$5-20
  • Total: ~$30-90 (0.3-0.9%)

Streaming swaps can reduce costs on larger orders.

THORChain Review - Security

⚠️ Critical: January 2025 Collapse

What happened: On January 23, 2025, THORChain's THORFi lending and savers programs became insolvent. Users lost over $200 million in deposited assets. Withdrawals were halted.

Root cause: THORFi's lending mechanism created unsustainable risk exposure. When market conditions deteriorated, the protocol couldn't cover liabilities.

Current status:

  • Core swap function continues operating
  • THORFi lending/savers remain halted
  • Legal action pending (THORFi Recovery Group vs THORChain)
  • Recovery uncertain

Other Security Incidents (2025)

April 2025: $1.2M security breach affecting cross-chain operations.

September 2025: Co-founder JP Thor's personal wallet drained of $1.35M via Telegram social engineering scam (not protocol issue, but raises concerns about operational security).

Money Laundering Concerns

February 2025: DPRK hackers (Lazarus Group) used THORChain to launder funds from the Bybit exchange hack. This has drawn regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage.

Security Assessment

  • Smart contract risk: High. Complex cross-chain architecture with multiple attack vectors.

  • Economic risk: Very high. THORFi collapse demonstrated poor risk management.
  • Regulatory risk: High. Money laundering association creates legal uncertainty.
  • Core swap risk: Medium. Swap function has operated longer without major exploits.

Our Security Rating: 2.5/5 — The THORFi collapse and money laundering issues are severe. Core swaps appear functional but overall trust is damaged.

THORChain Review - Should You Use THORChain?

When THORChain Makes Sense

✅ You need native BTC → ETH (or similar) without CEX ✅ Small-to-medium amounts only ✅ You understand and accept the risks ✅ No alternatives work for your situation

When to Avoid THORChain

❌ Large amounts (use OTC or CEX) ❌ Any yield/lending products (THORFi) ❌ You're risk-averse ❌ Regulatory compliance matters to you ❌ You need reliable, predictable service

Alternatives to Consider

For cross-chain:

  • Centralized exchanges — More trusted, regulated, but custodial
  • LayerZero/Stargate — Bridge infrastructure, uses wrapped assets
  • Chainflip — Newer competitor to THORChain

For single-chain:

THORChain Review - RUNE Token

Token Role:

  • Bonded by validators to secure network
  • Paired with all assets in liquidity pools
  • Used for governance
  • Native transaction fees

The Circular Risk: RUNE price affects protocol security. If RUNE crashes:

  • Validator bonds worth less
  • Pool liquidity decreases
  • Protocol becomes less secure

This creates reflexive risk that amplified the 2025 collapse.

Conclusion THORChain Review 2026

THORChain offers genuinely unique technology — native cross-chain swaps without wrapped tokens. This solves a real problem that no other decentralized protocol addresses at scale.

But the January 2025 collapse ($200M+ losses), money laundering association, and ongoing legal action make this a high-risk protocol. Use with extreme caution.

THORChain is best for:

  • Specific native cross-chain swap needs
  • Users who can't access CEXs
  • Small amounts with understood risk
  • The swap function ONLY (not yield products)

THORChain is NOT for:

  • Risk-averse users
  • Large amounts
  • Yield/lending (THORFi collapsed)
  • Compliance-conscious users
  • Anyone who can use alternatives

Our Rating: 3.2/5

Bottom Line: Impressive technology, dangerous execution. The native swap innovation is real, but the track record is troubling. Use only if you specifically need what THORChain offers and can accept the risks. For most users, alternatives are safer.

For single-chain swaps, see our Uniswap Review or Jupiter Review. For perps, see our Hyperliquid Review.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is THORChain safe?

THORChain's core swap functionality has operated for years, but the protocol has serious issues. The January 2025 THORFi collapse resulted in $200M+ user losses. The protocol has been used for money laundering. Legal action is pending. We recommend using only the swap function with limited amounts, if at all.

What happened to THORChain in 2025?

In January 2025, THORChain's THORFi lending and savers programs became insolvent, resulting in $200M+ in user losses. Withdrawals were halted. In February 2025, DPRK hackers used THORChain to launder Bybit hack funds. Legal action against the protocol was announced in May 2025.

What are THORChain fees?

Native THORChain transactions cost 0.02 RUNE. You also pay source and destination chain fees (BTC network fees, ETH gas). Total swap cost is typically 0.1-0.5% including all fees. Streaming swaps can reduce costs on large orders.

Is THORChain better than bridges?

For true native swaps, THORChain offers something bridges don't — you hold real assets, not wrapped tokens. However, THORChain has its own significant risks including the 2025 collapse. Bridges have wrapper/custodial risks but may be more operationally stable. Neither is perfectly safe.

Can I use THORChain for yield?

We strongly advise against using THORChain for any yield products. The THORFi lending and savers programs collapsed in January 2025, resulting in $200M+ user losses. These products remain halted. Use THORChain only for swaps if at all.

Why is THORChain controversial?

Beyond the $200M collapse, THORChain has been identified as a money laundering tool. DPRK state hackers used it to launder funds from the Bybit hack. This creates regulatory scrutiny and reputational damage. Some in the community debate whether truly permissionless protocols should block such transactions.